Request an architecture briefing

Who is behind Wet Ink

Who is building it

Michael Silva builds Wet Ink. He previously built the governed agent platform that proved this kernel's enforcement pattern — a system where AI-produced work moves through database-enforced gates, evidence ledgers, and human approval before anything counts as done. Wet Ink rebuilds that discipline clean for the highest-stakes document judgments in home lending. The name comes from banking's most human artifact — the wet signature, the authoritative original. Every AI action gets its wet-ink moment: a distinct, accountable approval, in a record built to outlast the meeting where it happened.

What is claimed and not claimed

Claimed
  • The sealing architecture is real: an append-only, tamper-evident record with schema-enforced maker/checker separation, and 85 passing proofs behind it.
  • The architecture's design basis is full-population reperformance — every file, each with its own evidence pack.
  • We designed the record for recomputation by an outside verifier — trust the math, not the screen.
Not claimed
  • No live loan review. The AI judgment layer does not yet exist; no loan file is under review today. See what runs today.
  • No customers, no pilots, no deployments — and therefore no customer results, anywhere on this site.
  • No accuracy percentages. None exists to quote, so none appears.
  • No certifications and no auditor's conclusions — no "compliant," no "examiner-approved." Coverage evidence only, stated with its denominator.
  • Not "tamper-proof," and not a blockchain. The record is tamper-evident — a per-tenant hash chain in Postgres — and the chain catches alterations rather than preventing them.

Press

For press and analyst inquiries, write directly — a named mailbox, not a form.

For the regulatory context Wet Ink answers, start withthe LL-2026-04 explainer — what the framework obligates seller/servicers to do, and what an answer built to be checked looks like.